1st Place – Nicholas Katz

Nicholas Katz

As the saying goes, familiarity breeds contempt. This is how we feel about driving. The first time each of us got behind the wheel of a motor vehicle we were awed by the responsibility, scared of the risks, and careful to ensure to do everything correctly. Over the years of driving we lose each of those feelings, the responsibility, the fear, the care. People drive distracted every day, thinking that the unthinkable will never happen to them. A split second, however, can prove them fatally wrong. For the last five years, I’ve worked as a police officer and as a member of the New Haven Police Department Crash Reconstruction Team. I’ve seen firsthand the dire consequences that can follow from distracted driving. I’ve seen the victims over and over again … the unsuspecting driver, the pedestrian standing on the sidewalk, the bicyclist, even an infant in a stroller being pushed across the street. I’ve seen the bloody scenes and I’ve gone to the autopsies.

I’ve worked on Distracted Driving Checkpoints, where we specifically target drivers on their cell phones and issue infractions. These Distracted Driving checkpoints and targeted enforcement drives are a failure. They cannot stem the tide. The police cannot be on all roads at all times and drivers know that they’re unlikely to be caught by us. The task of decreasing distracted drivers fall on all parts of society. Drivers have the initial responsibility, but the government and law enforcement must take steps to ensure that drivers embrace that responsibility. The first step is recognition and analysis of the problem. Multiple government studies have shown the negative effects of distracted driving. As the use of technology increases along with the accident rates, state governments have taken action to fight the epidemic. Many states have banned the hand-held use of cell phones for drivers. Several states have passed laws specifically banning texting. While this law is well-intended, police officers find it difficult to enforce, as it is almost impossible to prove that someone was texting while driving.

Once a distracted driving law is passed, it falls on law enforcement agencies to ensure that drivers are following them. In many departments, staffing issues causes motor vehicle enforcement to be neglected. Law enforcement is necessary but is only part of the solution. Increased awareness of the issue by the general population is required. Additional avenues must be explored to assist the police. Some states have experimented with traffic signs on highways notifying drivers of the state distracted driving laws and the consequences of violating them. A more targeted and potentially effective approach are cell phone apps that automatically prevent drivers from using the phone until stopped. This might prove to be the most effective method of preventing distracted driving, but is dependent on the dedication of the driver to use the app.

The government could take additional action to encourage smartphone manufacturers to make this app automatically installed on all phones and force users to acknowledge the risks of utilizing their phone while drivers. While drivers who don’t care about the risks will simply opt out of using the app, it might serve to increase awareness and reduce the incidence of distracted driving. A different technological approach might involve utilizing vehicles to monitor and control drivers. Certain insurance companies already use a telematics device to monitor and record driver information to adjust insurance policies. The same technology and information could be used to evaluate drivers for the effects of distracted driving – inability to maintain lanes, sudden braking, or other indicators of the driver not paying attention. These measures could be effective, but are increasingly intrusive on driver privacy. In the face of all the distractions, we must face the possibility is that there is little that society can do to truly impact distracted driving without negatively impacting civil liberties. Like many other of society’s vices, we must balance the cost it has on the population versus the enjoyment we receive from it and the cost it would take to regulate the vice.

The dedication of drivers is the most integral part to any reduction in distracted driving. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration estimated that at any moment during the daylight hours, about 660,000 drivers are handling cell phones or other electronic devices while driving in the U.S. Distracted driving is a real issue that will not go away on its own. We must all accept responsibility for our actions, and do our part to help save lives. Education and awareness may be the biggest help in reducing distracted driving. Increased education for drivers on the risks they face including serious injury, death, criminal charges, and civil liability, might make drivers less willing to tolerate those risks. My experiences in seeing the trauma that results has made me sure to always pay attention to the road, experiences that will remain with me for the rest of my life. I’ll never forget the personal impact my experiences have had on me, and I hope our society can continue to take steps to reduce the lives lost from distracted driving.

Avvo Badge

"Top Attorney" —Avvo Rating

Personal Injury
Tim Tate
Multi-Million Dollar Advocates Forum logo

Multi-Million Dollar Advocates Forum

Top Trial Lawyers in America™ Tim Tate & Chris Rehmet Life Members
Avvo

Texas Trial Lawyer Association

Tim Tate & Chris Rehmet
Better Business Bureau logo

Better Business Bureau

A+ Rating
Tim, Claire, and Chris

Featured FAQ

How do I get the most money for my case?

Evidence is essential in order to get top dollar for an injury case. This means there must be proof of who was at fault for the accident and that the accident caused your injuries. Police reports and witness statements go a long way to proving fault while detailed medical records from qualified doctors (many times orthopedics or neurologists) are used to show the cause and extent of the injuries. We work to build a solid case in order to seek maximum compensation for our clients’ injuries.

Is there a benefit to being represented by a lawyer?

Most of the time in an accident injury situation, an insurance company will be your opponent. Insurance companies are very skilled at denying or minimizing injury claims – that’s how they make money. Insurance adjusters regularly deny claims that should be paid, or they offer only a small percent of the fair value of a claim. Our goal is the opposite. We develop a settlement package presenting our client’s case that often can result in our client receiving 10 to 20 times more compensation than what the insurance adjusters might offer for their injury claim. In such case, even after legal fees, our clients can net more money in their pocket. Even better, we work on a completely contingent basis, so there are no legal fees unless we are successful in collecting compensation for our clients.

Should I talk to the insurance company?

Do not talk to anyone at the insurance company. This includes their insurance adjusters and defense lawyers. Insurance companies frequently record phone conversations during which they ask leading questions designed to produce testimony that they can use to deny your case. If we are your lawyers, we will do the talking for you so you do not fall into the insurance company traps that are designed to decrease the value of your claim.

How do I pay my medical bills?

Medical bills can be paid through various manners such as health insurance, Medicare, Medicaid, Personal Injury Protection insurance funds, deferred billing, and letters of protection. Depending on all of the facts surrounding your case and the insurance companies involved, we produce a strategy that we believe will best benefit our clients. Also, even if our clients do not have access to health insurance, we can assist them with getting medical care that is paid at the end of the case – which means no upfront medical bills.

How do I collect my lost income?

Even if an injured person is not able to work after an accident, insurance company tactics are to disagree and assert that the person could work so the insurance companies can deny the claim for lost income. It is important to have a qualified doctor’s medical documentation that proves the inability to work for a certain period of time due to an injury. We work with our clients’ doctors and employers to prove the medical reason for not working and the calculation of lost earnings. This frequently results in a fight with the insurance company, but we believe that with solid evidence we are ultimately able to win the fight and collect our clients’ lost income.

See ALL FAQs